Patent Pending
Because when reviews take months, the product has already moved on.
You’d actually look forward to security reviews — crazy, right?
Upload your product specifications, architecture notes, docs, or security policies (no diagrams required). SecurityReview™ uses your real documentation to run a complete standards-aligned security design review.
Every step is editable, so you can review, tweak, and validate before anything gets locked in. Even role designations and responsibilities can be adjusted (by you) at every stage.
Every team follows the same process, so nothing is overlooked. You don’t have to build a new model every time. Just use existing architecture docs, product specs, and security policies, even tribal knowledge from your teams, and we’ll use the same steps, the same logic, and the same structure for every review.
See exactly what’s risky, why it matters, and who should handle it. Findings are written in plain language, prioritized by impact, and mapped to the right role. As fixes are made, everything stays trackable, so nothing gets lost, and progress stays visible.
SecurityReview.ai maps risks across your entire system design, connecting subsystems, data paths, and dependencies, so you can stay ahead of systemic threats without surprises.
Pulls in content from Google Docs, Confluence, and Jira. You don’t need to switch platforms or create anything new just to get started.
You don’t have to. SecurityReview™ replaces weeks of manual security reviews, threat modeling, and compliance checks in minutes.
While other tools give you checklists or half-baked findings, we map real threats to your actual system, generate mitigation steps, and track everything in the tools your team already uses and the documentation you already have.
This is what clean and structured security design review, built around how your systems actually work, should look like.
SecurityReview™ is made for companies that can’t afford to get security wrong.
SecurityReview™ is made for companies that can’t afford to get security wrong.
Single Sign-On (SSO) lets your teams log in using your company’s existing identity provider (like Okta or Azure AD). No need to create new accounts or for extra credentials.
On-premises and private cloud hosting lets you run SecurityReview™ inside your infrastructure. Need to meet internal data policies or regional compliance requirements? We’re ready for that.
Unlimited reviews means no per-seat licensing and no limits on who can participate. Involve developers, security leads, risk teams, and auditors without jumping through licensing hoops.
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) lets you define exactly what each user can see and do. Security engineers can build models. Devs can review action items. Leadership can see risk summaries. All without exposing more than necessary.
We connect directly with tools your teams already use: Jira, Confluence, Google Docs, and more. That’s zero disruption to how work gets done.
SecurityReview™ wasn’t built in a vacuum. It was designed by someone who spent years stuck in the same broken and manual security review processes you’re trying to fix.
Abhay Bhargav, founder of we45, and the team behind SecurityReview™ have led hundreds of security design reviews for real-world products across finance, healthcare, government, SaaS, and beyond. This battle-tested methodology is born from a deep understanding and appreciation for how it can be done right.
Now, all of that hard-won experience is built into SecurityReview™, so your team can run expert-level security reviews in minutes without the bottleneck. Ready to use, right out of the box.
No. And honestly, it shouldn’t.
SecurityReview.ai augments your existing team by automating the repeatable stuff: security reviews, threat identification, and evidence generation.
Yes! SecurityReview.ai is On-Prem only.
We run inside your infrastructure, not ours. That means no data leaves your environment. Built on Azure OpenAI, so you get the power of LLMs, with the security and compliance posture of Microsoft’s enterprise-grade cloud stack.
You’re covered.
SecurityReview.ai generates review artifacts and findings aligned with your compliance frameworks (not generic outputs).
No. Never.
Your data stays in your on-prem environment, in a customer-dedicated deployment. We don’t retain, share, or train models on anything you run through the system.
Absolutely.
You control which LLMs are active, which documents are accessible, and what’s visible to the models. And since it’s deployed on your infra, you can log, monitor, and audit everything.
Yes, and we expect messy.
The AI doesn’t rely only on ticket quality. It pulls from architectural context, historical patterns, and embedded security knowledge to give you high-quality reviews, even when Jira’s a disaster zone.
It’s better.
We automate threat-informed security reviews that include threats, mitigations, and severity, without requiring drawn-out diagramming sessions.
Want to replace your existing threat modeling workflow? You can.
Want to keep it and enhance it? You can do that too.
Yep.
Reviews can be triggered from feature tickets, epics, pull requests, or even by uploading an architecture doc. SecurityReview.ai fits right into your SDLC, no process overhauls needed.
100%.
Every review includes export-ready docs (PDF, Markdown, Confluence-ready) with:
Threats
Mitigations
Risk levels
Traceability
Audit evidence
Perfect for compliance teams, internal security governance, or external auditors.
We work with the tools you already use. That means docs from Jira, Confluence, Google Docs, ServiceNow, GitHub, and soon SharePoint. Got a random upload? No problem, we ingest those too. Audio files and Zoom calls are coming soon.
We’ve built the system to handle exactly that. Here’s how:
It checks document quality right away:
When you upload your docs, the system scans them and tells you how good or bad they are. You get a clear quality score so you know if you’re missing critical details.
It asks smart follow-up questions:
If something doesn’t add up or is missing, the system asks for more info. It doesn’t just fill in gaps with guesses; instead, it asks you for what it needs.
You approve each step before it moves on:
You get a chance to check the threats, the risks, and the fixes at every stage, so even if the starting docs are weak, the output won’t be.
Yes, and we love that. Drop in any vulnerability scans or pentest outputs. Our system uses them to identify stronger threats and countermeasures. But to be clear: we don’t try to replace your scanning tools or tie their results directly to threats. We’re not an ASPM platform, and we’re not pretending to be.